Eatomics is an R-Shiny based web application that enables interactive exploration of quantitative proteomics data generated by MaxQuant software - specifically label-free quantification (LFQ) and Intensity Based Absolute Quantification (iBAQ) values. Eatomics enables fast exploration of differential abundance and pathway analysis to researchers with limited bioinformatics knowledge. The application aids in quality control of the quantitative proteomics data, visualization, differential abundance and pathway analysis. Highlights of the application are an extensive experimental setup module, the data download and report generation feature and the multiple ways to interact and customize the analysis.

1. Input files

Eatomics requires two file inputs:

  1. Demo_proteinGroups.txt: The proteinGroups.txt (i.e. a tab-separated files) as generated by the quantitative analysis software of raw mass spectrometry data - MaxQuant. The file should contain at least the columns Protein IDs, Majority protein IDs, Gene names, LFQ/iBAQ measurement columns, Reverse, Potential contaminant, Only identified by site. The latter three may be empty.

  2. Demo_clinicaldata.txt: The sample description file - a tab separated text file as can be produced with any Office program by saving the spread sheet as .txt. The file needs to contain a column named “PatientID”, which contains IDs that match the sample ID’s from the proteinGroups header (without the “LFQ intensity” or “iBAQ” prefixes) and one or more named columns with “parameters”, i.e. textual/factual/logical or continuous/integer values. Column names have to be unique.

Access to demo data is possible directly via the upload button if ou are testing on our public server. For your local installation you may use your own data or the demo files in Eatomics/Data from the github repository. The demo proteinGroups file represents a shortened version of the data assessed and described in Chen et al. [4] and is accompanied by a sample description file prepared by us, based on the publications supplementary data.

Examples of input files needed for Eatomics are an evidence file as produced by the MaxQuant algorithm (left) and a sample description file which may contain as many parameters as available.

Examples of input files needed for Eatomics are an evidence file as produced by the MaxQuant algorithm (left) and a sample description file which may contain as many parameters as available.

2. Application walk-through

Eatomics functionality is structured into four tab panels:

All tabs consist of a side panel to configure the analysis and a main panel for interactive analysis visualization.

Step 1: Load and Prepare

The first tab provides an overview on the data quality and enables filtering and preparation of data for differential abundance and enrichment analysis ().

Configuration panel

Within the side panel the user can load data and configure quality control options.

Load proteinGroups.txt input file

To begin the analysis the user has to upload the MaxQuant file (e.g.proteinGroups.txt), as specified above. After full upload of the file, rows that were only found in the reverse database, belonging to potential contaminants or that have only been identified by site are filtered automatically.

Quality control and data cleansing

Load the sample description/clinical data file

Select and load the clinical data input file (e.g clinicaldata.txt), as specified above.

Configuration panel to load input data and to prepare the data set for analysis.

Configuration panel to load input data and to prepare the data set for analysis.

Visualization panel

In the main panel (right) interactive visualizations are shown.

Principal component analysis

A common method of dimensionality reduction is principal component analysis (PCA). Inherently, PCA calculates axes of most variation (principal components) within the abundance data. A common assumption is that a plot along the axes of most variation will segregate all samples/patients into groups under investigation. The user can choose which principle components to visualize in the PCA and can choose to color the samples based on the uploaded sample/clinical characteristics.

Distribution overview

The distribution overview gives an impression on the sample-wise distribution of all measured intensities.

Protein coverage

Protein coverage describes the count of distinct protein groups per sample.

Sample to sample heatmap

The sample-to-sample heatmap describes the biological and technical variability of the samples. The user can choose to use Euclidean distance or Pearson correlation as a (dis-) similarity metric. Formed clusters should resemble the sample groups under investigation.

Cumulative Protein Intensities

Protein intensities are cumulated across all samples and plotted according to their relative abundance. Colouring marks the respective quantile of the proteins. Highly abundant proteins, i.e., proteins ranked in the first quartile are colored in red and labels are specified. The top 20 ranked proteins and their cumulated intensity are given in the table to the right.

Visualization of protein abundance in a PCA.

Visualization of protein abundance in a PCA.

Sample-wise distribution overview of protein abundance data.

Sample-wise distribution overview of protein abundance data.

Sample-wise coverage of protein abundance data.
Sample to sample heatmap.
Cumulative protein intensities of all samples.

Step 2: Differential abundance

In step 2, the user is enabled to translate a given hypothesis on the data into an experimental design and to test the hypothesis. Eatomics uses limma [2] to perform real time analysis of differentially expressed proteins amongst clinical parameters of choice. The resulting interactive visualization plot including volcano plots (detailed below) allows a quick and detailed overview on the differential abundance. limma (linear models for microarray data), is a commonly used R/Bioconductor software package for analyzing microarray and RNA-seq data. Limma fits a linear model which can be parametrized in Eatomics elaborate experimental design module.

Experimental design configuration

Experimental design module with two categorical variables.

Experimental design module with two categorical variables.

Experimental design module with a continuous variable.

Experimental design module with a continuous variable.

Visualization of differentially abundant proteins

The result of differential abundance analysis is displayed in an interactive volcano plot, two tables of up- and downregulated proteins and box and scatter plots of actual protein abundance.

Volcano plot

The volcano plot shows the log2 fold change value on the x-axis and the negative log10 of the Benjamini-Hochberg Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value on the y-axis. Significant results are shown in yellow. The threshold of log2 fold change and p-values considered significant can be set by the user directly within the threshold box. A hover over a dot in the volcanoe plot will display the respective gene name. A positive fold change can be interpreted as that protein being higher in abundance in the first selected group when compared to the second, in the case of a categorical response. When a continuous response is modeled, the fold change has to be interpreted as the slope, i.e., increase (positive log2 fold change) or decrease (negative log2 fold change), of the protein abundance with regard to a change of one unit of the response variable. For example, if age is analyzed, a log2 fold change of -0.2 would mean a decrease of about 1.15 (2^0.2) in LFQ intensity and thus protein abundance with every year of age.

Result tables and box/scatter plots

Significant results are listed in two tables below the volcano plot. They show the actual logFC, p-value and the adjusted p-value. A click on a protein entry in the data table produces a box (in the case of a categorical response variable) or scatter plot (in the case of a continuous response variable) showing the actual abundance values of selected proteins with regard to the tested comparisons.
The color of individual dots can be chosen to reflect a parameter from the sample description file.

Volcano plot of differential abundance analysis and the threshold box for user-defined adjusted p-value and log2 fold change cutoff.

Volcano plot of differential abundance analysis and the threshold box for user-defined adjusted p-value and log2 fold change cutoff.

Box plot of selected proteins as a result of a categorical response variable. Color of the points can be selected by the user from the sample description file.

Box plot of selected proteins as a result of a categorical response variable. Color of the points can be selected by the user from the sample description file.

Scatter plot with a linear fit through data points of a selected protein as a result of a continuous response variable. Color of the points can be selected by the user from the sample description file as in the box plot.

Scatter plot with a linear fit through data points of a selected protein as a result of a continuous response variable. Color of the points can be selected by the user from the sample description file as in the box plot.

Step 3: Enrichment score calculation (ssGSEA)

The calculation of ssGSEA (single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) scores is mainly a prerequisite to perform differential enrichment in step 4 and is adapted from Krug et al. [1] (https://github.com/broadinstitute/ssGSEA2.0).

The ssGSEA algorithm performs a transformation of protein abundance values into the higher abstraction level of gene sets or pathways on a sample level. Each ssGSEA enrichment score (ES or normalized ES (NES)) represents the degree to which the genes in a particular gene set are coordinately up- or down-regulated within a single sample. The output of this step are three files basically containing all gene sets of a gene set database and a corresponding enrichment score per sample. Additinally, p values or false discovery rates are calculated. Advantages of this approach include the flexible in- and exlcusion of samples without recalculation of differentially expressed proteins and presumably the possibility of reducing batch effects.

The user selects a gene set from the list of MsigDB (H-) Hallmark, (C5.all.-) Gene Ontology (GO) all terms or subsets of GO molecular function (C5.mf.), GO biological process (C5.bp.), or GO cellular compartment (C5.cc.), (C2.cp.reactome-) Reactome, (C2.cp.biocarta.-) Biocarta or (C2.cp.kegg.-) KEGG to calculate the enrichment score. Alternatively, the user may provide a custom gene set file in .gmt format by pasting it into the texttt{Data/GeneSetDBs} folder. As in the original code, many parameters may be set by an expert user. However, for a quick setup the default options from the original publication are implemented. For convenience, the user may specify a prefix for the output files. Enrichment scores are stored as .gct files the Data/EnrichmentScores folder to be accessed from the next tab. An alert message will be pop up on completion of calculation.

Configuration panel to set up ssGSEA calculation.

Configuration panel to set up ssGSEA calculation.

Step 4: Differential enrichment

Using the ssGSEA procedure to calculate per sample enrichment scores enables us to re-use the differential abundance logic from the second tab panel to be used again for differential enrichments. As such, step 4 allows the user to apply the research hypothesis directly to the enrichment scores and find gene sets and pathways that are significantly enriched.

As a result, the UI is almost identical to step 2. As a difference, instead of using the prepared preotein abundance data, the user has to choose the enrichment score file from those prepared on the ssGSEA tab. The selected file should be the plain enrichment score file, so neither the file containing the p-values suffix, nor fdr-suffix file are appropriate. After configuring the experimental design, results are visualized in the interactive volcano plot and gene lists and box plots are available for further exploration as well. Significant results are gene sets, e.g. GO terms or pathways, that are enriched in the first experimental group versus the second group. Fold changes give an impression on the effect size, which is an advantage over other methods, which mainly deliver p-values to assess importance.

Configuration panel for differential enrichment analysis with a selection of the previously prepared ssGSEA score.

Configuration panel for differential enrichment analysis with a selection of the previously prepared ssGSEA score.

Report and data download

On both differential analysis tabs (step 2 and 4) there are buttons for displaying more detailed information on the configured experimental design and for the download of report and data tables.

Detailed experimantal description wihtin the app and two buttons to download the report pdf and the data tables.

Detailed experimantal description wihtin the app and two buttons to download the report pdf and the data tables.

Eatomics output files are data table with multiple sheets containing all information generated throughout the analysis and a written report with all images and explanations for better interpretation.

Eatomics output files are data table with multiple sheets containing all information generated throughout the analysis and a written report with all images and explanations for better interpretation.

3. References

1: Krug, K., et al., A Curated Resource for Phosphosite-specific Signature Analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2019. 18(3): p. 576-593.

2: Ritchie, Matthew E., et al. “limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.” Nucleic acids research 43.7 (2015): e47-e47.

3: Lazar, C., “imputeLCMD: a collection of methods for left-censored missing data imputation.” R package, version 2 (2015).

4: Chen, Christina Yingxian, et al. “Suppression of detyrosinated microtubules improves cardiomyocyte function in human heart failure.” Nature medicine 24.8 (2018): 1225-1233.

5: Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, Balasubramanian Narasimhan and Gilbert Chu (2018). impute: impute: Imputation for microarray data. R package version 1.56.0.

4. Glossary

MaxQuant - MaxQuant is one of the most frequently used platforms for mass-spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics data analysis. It integrates a multitude of algorithms, enabling complete analysis of MS data. One of the major strengths of MaxQuant is that, by the application of advanced algorithms, it substantially improves mass precision as well as mass accuracy. (https://www.nature.com/articles/nprot.2016.136)

PCA - Principal Component Analysis is a dimensionality-reduction method that is often used to reduce the dimensionality of large data sets, by transforming a large set of variables into a smaller one that still contains most of the information in the large set.

Limma - Limma is the algorithm underlying the calculation of differences in protein abundance. Limma is based on linear models to calculate differential abundance and takes the model of data distribution, mean-variance trend, missing data and multiple testing correction into account.

Benjamini-Hochberg procedure – BH procedure is included in the topTable function of the Limma package and the p.adjust method. It controls the false discovery rate (FDR) where the expected proportion of false positives among all positive test decisions are calculated. (doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-288)

ssGSEA - The ssGSEA algorithm performs a transformation of protein abundance values into the higher abstraction level of gene sets, pathways or even phospho-site signatures on a sample level. Each ssGSEA enrichment score represents the degree to which the genes in a particular gene set are coordinately up- or down-regulated within a single sample.

ES and NES - (Normalized) enrichement scores as calculated by the ssGSEA algorithm.

iBAQ - Intensity Based Absolute Quantification refers to the sum of all the peptides intensities divided by the number of observable peptides of a protein https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euprot.2014.06.001

LFQ - label-free quantification approach aims to compare the mass spectrometric signal of any given peptides or the number of fragment spectra identifying peptides of a given protein Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics.

Imputation methods

Distance/similarity Measures